Skip to:

  1. Skip to Jira Navigation
  2. Skip to Side Navigation
  3. Skip to Main Content

Template Anamnese (Kernset 2.3) te streng

Description

 Van: Arianne van de Wetering
Verzonden: woensdag 2 oktober 2019 17:36

I believe this schematron assert: 

is too strict considering what has been agreed between you and Perined.

I think we need to do a hotfix for this.

 Is it possible for you to ignore this error for the time being?

 

 

From: Chandler Faulman
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 10:47 AM
 

Yes the data element is used to indicate if the patient is under treatment for any of the problems the patient has within the Anamnese section.

 Just to clarify, we sent "No" for "Under Treatment?", because the patient did not have any of the specific disorders recorded under Anamnese. We included disorders within the Anamnese section because we are sending an explicit "No" for them.

 Since the patient does not have any disorders, then the patient can't be under treatment for the disorders, so we sent a "No" for that data element as well. So to me the schematron error doesn't make sense, but I am looking for clarification.

From: Cliff Wu
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 10:33 AM

 

I see the point of this, which is that it’s not actually a problem, but it’s a data element to indicate if the patient is undergoing treatment by a GP or specialist.

 Arianne, deze is een interessante.  Het lijkt me erop dat het niet echt over een specifieke aandoening gaat, maar meer over het behandeltraject van de patiënt. 

Wat mij betreft is het eigenlijk verstandig dat dit op Ja is gezet.  Kan jij me uitleggen waar er sprake van een “Nee” zou kunnen gelden?

  

From: Chandler Faulman
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 4:53 PM
 

Sorry for an additional question.

 As you know, we updated the pregnancy history to send an explicit No for any condition that wasn't marked for the patient. We are running into an issue where because none of the conditions were marked for the patient, we sent everything as No. Because we sent everything as No, we marked Onder behandling (geweest)? as "No" as well, because you can't be treated for conditions you never had.

 As a result, we are getting this schematron answer. Can you let us know how we should be handling this instead?

Proposed solution (NL)

None

Proposed solution (EN)

None

Release notes (NL)

Algemene anamnese mag ook opgenomen worden in het bericht als 'onder behandeling' niet ja is. Het functionele scenario en de technische templates voor Kernset 2.2 en 2.3 zijn hierop aangepast.

Release notes (EN)

None

Attachments

1

Activity

Show:

Arianne van de Wetering April 21, 2022 at 8:27 AM

Gepubliceerd in 2.3.5

Arianne van de Wetering February 11, 2020 at 3:04 PM
Edited

Removed the conditionality in the functional transaction for Kernset 2.2 and Kernset 2.3.

Removed the schematron assert in template 900963 for Kernset 2.2 and for Kernset 2.3.

Resolved
Pinned fields
Click on the next to a field label to start pinning.

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Onderdeel

2.3.5 Geboortezorg

Transactions

Kernset Aanleverbericht 2.2
Kernset Geboortezorg 2.3

Parties involved

Nictiz HL7-specialist

Priority

Better Excel Exporter

Created October 24, 2019 at 10:56 AM
Updated December 6, 2023 at 2:35 PM
Resolved April 21, 2022 at 8:27 AM